HEALTHCARE & ACCREDITATION · ICORP
Surgical safety checklists: making team pauses work in practice
A complete form and a meaningful safety conversation are different achievements.
The purpose is a shared pause
The WHO checklist separates checks before anaesthesia, before incision and before the patient leaves the operating room. [1] The process should fit those moments rather than become retrospective paperwork. Its value depends on giving the team an opportunity to identify unresolved concerns before proceeding.
Implementation requires a team
WHO identifies engagement, leadership, local champions, training, multidisciplinary work, coaching, feedback and local adaptation as implementation factors. [2] Its resources also emphasize verbal confirmation and team participation during the pauses. [3]
An ICORP implementation proposal
Rehearse the workflow with surgery, anaesthesia and nursing staff. Agree who coordinates each pause and how concerns are escalated before the next step. Observe whether each profession can contribute, then improve tool placement and the sequence of discussion. Do not remove safety content merely to produce a faster completion time.
Observe the conversation
Suggested measures include whether checks occur at the intended stage, the relevant team participates and identified concerns are addressed. Combine direct observation with records and staff feedback. Completion percentages alone do not show how the team communicated. This article neither promises prevention of every adverse event nor replaces local surgical or anaesthetic protocols.
For learning and quality improvement. This article synthesizes the references below. Practical suggestions are editorial proposals to adapt to local policies and context. It is not an official interpretation of JCI/HA requirements or guidance for treating an individual patient.
References
ICORP CONSULTING
JCI and HA consulting services
Gap assessment, quality system development and team readiness
Explore consulting services →